Solomon Stanley, a resident of Powder Springs, Georgia, has taken legal action against a local business for failing to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). On February 16, 2026, Stanley filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Joes 24 LLC. The lawsuit alleges that Joes Bottle Shop, operated by Joes 24 LLC, has numerous architectural barriers that prevent access to individuals with disabilities.
The complaint outlines several specific violations of the ADA at Joes Bottle Shop located at 3034 Veterans Memorial Highway in Austell, Georgia. According to Stanley, who suffers from mobility issues and relies on knee braces and a cane for movement, these barriers significantly impede his ability to access and enjoy the services offered by the shop. He describes issues such as improperly marked accessible parking that is unusable for disabled individuals due to severe slopes and insufficient maneuvering clearance within the store itself. These conditions not only violate federal law but also pose safety hazards for those with mobility impairments.
Stanley’s legal filing asserts that these barriers are part of a broader pattern of discrimination by Joes 24 LLC against individuals with disabilities. He argues that the company has failed to make necessary modifications or remove obstacles despite being required to do so under ADA regulations. The complaint emphasizes that these failures have denied him and others like him full and equal enjoyment of goods and services provided by the establishment. Moreover, Stanley highlights his intent to return to the property in March 2026 but notes that it would be futile until compliance is achieved.
In seeking redress from the court, Solomon Stanley requests injunctive relief mandating Joes 24 LLC to bring its facilities into compliance with ADA standards where feasible. This includes making all readily achievable alterations to ensure accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Additionally, he seeks reasonable modifications in policies and practices that currently hinder access for disabled patrons. Alongside these changes, Stanley is pursuing attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and other costs associated with bringing this action forward.
Represented by attorney Pete M. Monismith from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Solomon Stanley’s case underscores ongoing challenges faced by disabled individuals in accessing public accommodations despite longstanding federal mandates designed to protect their rights. The case is presided over by Judge SCJ under Case No. 1:26-cv-00899-SCJ.
Source: 126cv00899_Soloon_Stanley_v_Joes_24_Complaint_Northern_District_of_Georgia.pdf
